*My Comment: Does anyone know where I can find the 
Pennsylvania Health Impact Study? Oh, never mind there isn't one. (sarcasm) Our 
'governor' took the industry money and sold PA down the well bore while the 
local political stooges rolled over like submissive lap dogs. (not sarcasm) -JT
New York Fracking Reportedly Held As Andrew Cuomo, RFK Jr. 
Talk Health Impacts
AP 
| By By MICHAEL GORMLEY Posted: 03/02/2013 
12:07 pm EST | Updated: 03/02/2013 8:34 pm 
EST 
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — 
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo came as close as he ever has to approving fracking 
last month, laying out a limited drilling plan for as many as 40 gas wells 
before changing course to await the findings of a new study after discussions 
with environmentalist and former brother-in-law Robert F. Kennedy Jr., several 
people familiar with his thinking told The Associated Press.
The turning point, which could delay a decision for up to a year or longer, 
came in a series of phone calls with Kennedy. The two discussed a new health 
study on the hydraulic fracturing drilling method that could be thorough enough 
to trump all others in a debate that has split New York for five years.
"I think the issue suddenly got simple for 
him," Kennedy told the AP, then went on to paraphrase Cuomo in their 
discussions: "'If it's causing health problems, I really don't want it in New 
York state. And if it's not causing health problems, we should figure out a 
way we can do it.'"
Kennedy and two other 
people close to Cuomo, who spoke to the AP only on condition of anonymity 
because Cuomo is carefully guarding his discussions on the issue, confirmed the 
outlines of the plan the governor was considering to allow 10 to 40 test wells 
in economically depressed southern New York towns that want drilling and the 
jobs it promises. The plan would allow the wells to operate under intense 
monitoring by the state to see if fracking should continue or expand.
They all said it was 
the closest Cuomo has come in his two years in office to making a decision on 
whether to green-light drilling.
The state has had a moratorium on the process since 2008 while other states 
in the gas-rich Marcellus Shale formation, such as Pennsylvania, have seen local 
economies boom as drilling rigs have sprouted up.
Cuomo issued a brief statement Saturday through a spokesman saying that the 
state departments of environmental conservation and health are "in the process 
of making a determination with respect to the safety and health impacts of 
fracking.
"After, and only after, they conclude their work will the state's position 
be determined — it's that simple and it hasn't and doesn't change with any 
conversations," Cuomo spokesman Josh Vlasto said.
The governor continues to refuse to talk about his internal process and 
wouldn't comment directly for this story. He has been repeating the phrase he's 
used for two years, that "science, not politics" will rule.
Kennedy, brother of 
Cuomo's ex-wife, Kerry, described a governor who is intensely involved in the 
emotion-charged issue, which Cuomo privately likened to taking on the National 
Rifle Association over gun control laws. Kennedy said Cuomo reached out 
personally to many others as well in his evaluation.
Kennedy believes Cuomo held off in large part because of the 
prospect of a new $1 million study by the Geisinger Health System of 
Pennsylvania, billed by property owners seeking safe fracking and 
environmentalists as a "large-scale, scientifically rigorous assessment" of 
drilling in Pennsylvania.
The study will look at detailed health histories of hundreds of thousands 
of patients who live near wells and other facilities that are producing natural 
gas from the same Marcellus Shale formation that New York would tap.
Unlike most studies funded by advocates or opponents of hydrofracking, this 
study would be funded by the Sunbury, Pa.-based Degenstein Foundation, which is 
not seen as having an ideological bent.
"I think it will be pivotal," Kennedy said. Preliminary results are 
expected within the year, but there is no specific timetable and final results 
could be years off. Kennedy is opposed to fracking unless it can be proven to be 
safe for the environment and public. He said he's unsure what the Geisinger 
report will conclude.
The research and education arm of the Independent Petroleum Association of 
America cried foul at the private conversations of the powerful public 
figures.
"This is pretty 
outrageous, above and beyond the four-year charade that's already occurred," 
said Steve Everley of Energy in Depth. "The governor has insisted publicly that 
his review of hydraulic fracturing will be based on science, and yet he's 
actually making decisions about New York's future based on backroom 
conversations with a Kennedy.
"Maybe if Governor Cuomo had been as interested in speaking with other 
regulators as he was in speaking with his former brother-in-law, he would have 
recognized that shale development can be and is being done safely, and folks 
struggling to find work upstate might actually have jobs," Everley said.
Dan Fitzsimmons, leader of the Joint Landowners Coalition of New York, a 
pro-drilling group, said opposition to hydrofracking is based on politics, not 
science.
"Delay, delay delay, that's been the name of the game with these folks, and 
the sad thing about Cuomo is that he's allowing it," Fitzsimmons said. "How long 
are you going to throw away taxpayer dollars over politics?"
But Adrian Kuzminski, a fracking opponent with the group Sustainable 
Otsego, said he fears that the test wells Cuomo has been considering would be "a 
stalking horse" for more drilling.
"After a couple of years they're going to say 'Oh, we don't see any 
problems,'" Kuzminski said. "There's no need for test wells in New York state. 
The information is just out there."
Shortly after the conversations with Kennedy in early February, Cuomo's 
health commissioner, Dr. Nirav Shah, mentioned the Geisinger study among three 
health reviews still pending and which could enter into Cuomo's decision. Shah, 
a nationally respected public health figure, was an associate investigator at 
the Geisinger Center for Health Research before going to work for Cuomo.
Sandra Steingraber, a 
biologist and founder of New Yorkers Against Fracking, said Saturday, "As Health Commissioner Shah said, the right 
time to study fracking is before fracking begins. We expect that Governor Cuomo 
will listen to scientists and medical experts and let evidence dictate whether 
or not to lift our state's moratorium, and we further expect that he will wait 
for national studies and a real New York-specific study."
Cuomo, a popular Democrat who supporters say may run for president in 2016, 
is getting criticism from both sides over his delayed decision and calls for 
more studies. Landowners and industry say they're missing out on an economic 
boom while environmentalists say the administration should have ordered a full 
health study and has been too opaque about the regulatory process.
Some pundits have 
questioned whether Cuomo was "becoming Hamlet on the Shale," echoing a reference 
to criticism of his father, former Gov. Mario Cuomo, who spent politically 
damaging months as "Hamlet on the Hudson" publicly debating whether to run for 
president. It's a characterization Kennedy rejects.
Many federal and state regulators say hydraulic fracturing, which injects a 
mix of water and chemicals thousands of feet underground to crack open shale and 
release natural gas, is safe when done properly and thousands of sites have few 
complaints of pollution. But environmental groups and some doctors say 
regulations still aren't stringent enough and the practice can pollute ground 
water. The Marcellus Shale lies under parts of New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio and 
West Virginia.
"What's interesting is Andrew is trying to 
figure this out," Kennedy said. "It's interesting to see this ... that usually 
doesn't happen. (Most governors) take a poll, or they take industry money and 
just do it ... but I think this is the harder 
route."
 
 
I would think that if hydraulic fracturing for unconvential shale gas and oil is as "safe" as the industry and Steve Everley of 'Energy in Depth' claim, they should welcome an independent health impact study to prove their point.
ReplyDeleteAlso, someone needs to inform Dan Fitzsimmons that an independent health study is based on science - not politics... or greed.